War thunder challenger 2 leak2/2/2024 To protect against the contemporary AT systems the tank faced, the effective chemical protection of the Composite Block and ERA together must be greater than 1000mm. 400mm against tandem charges would not be sufficient, if this was so they tank would have almost certainly been destroyed during Telic atleast once. Currently the entire ERA block has an effective thickness of 30mm against AP and 400mm against Chemical. This was developed to combat the growing use of tandem charge weaponry used during operation Telic. The Challenger 2 TES is equipped with a double stacked(twin layered) ERA package on the sides of the vehicle, it is placed upon a Dorchester Composition Side Panel of varying thickness. The warheads for these systems can be tandem charges. The Penetration Range for these vary but the accepted range is roughly 600mm-800mm of RHa for the RPG’s and up to 1000mm’s for the Milan Missile. Secondly: Contemporary launcher systems it has faced: Now firstly I’ll state the the most obvious fact about the Challenger 2. Suggestion 3: Armour Effectiveness and Thickness. Increase the performance of L23A1 on the challenger 2 by increasing its velocity and therefore penetration to atleast 1650m/s. Suggested Fix: Increase the thickness of RHa that HESH shells can create spall behind to 450mm. This was developed to allow the use of a low cost, higher performance round for the Oman Challenger vs the old L23A1 with the L8 charge. L23A1 for the 元0A1 should also be improved, with the Oman Army now using an L23 round with the improved L18A1 charge which was tested and passed in 2013/2014. The 元1A7 HESH round is capable of causing a spall through 450mm of RHa as shown in the sources. Pages 60, 152 - (Quoted memoirs from Sgt Brian Maddams 2RTR)ĭescription: In-Game The L23A1 and 元1A7 HESH rounds are given unrealistic performance. Source: Haynes - Challenger 2 Owners Manual by Richard Taylor - 19:00 UTC 27/12/21 And improve the rotational mobility of the Challenger 2, with 4126NM of torque this tank should not struggle to turn like it currently does. Suggested Fix: Increase the maximum speed of the Challenger 2 to 80kph, the Challenger 2E to 78kph, the 2F to around 72-74kph. The Challenger 1 has better mobility with a worse gearbox. The series of tanks also has an issue with turning mobility, with the tank struggling to turn itself without multiple odd gear shifts and even then it is slow. When 12 Tonnes lighter this tank is capable of much more. The publicly stated top speed is for the TES Kit at the full 75 Tonne Load. I would therefore assume that although heavier, the top speed of the Challenger 2F would be around 72kph. While the Challenger 2E is capable of a measured 78kph. And please feel free to correct me or contribute.ĭescription: As shown in the sources provided, the Challenger 2 Gun Tank is capable of a top speed of 80kph. General Statement: I will start off by stating this is a collection of info I have accumulated from this Forum, Reddit, Internet Sources and Books, i will try to source everything I have accumulated but in some cases it is not possible. Affected Vehicles: Challenger 2, Challenger 2(E), Challenge 2(F), Challenger 2 TES, Challenger 2 OES(If Implemented).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |